|
SALTY DAWG™ Marine Oil Spill Response Kit Helps Boaters To Comply With Clean Marina Standards. |
|
A "Clean Marina" means "Clean Boating". Every boat owner needs to take responsibility and care in cleaning up marine oil and fuel spills or leakage with this marine spill kit. The "Salty Dawg™" Marine Boating Spill Kit helps boaters to comply with Clean Marina Standards, ensuring our waterways remain vital and safe for all to enjoy. Avoid non-compliance issues and make a personal contribution to protecting our environment – The "Salty Dawg™" Boaters Marina Spill Kit is Man's best friend.
|
|
| "Why Use Dawg Marine Spill
Kits" – Read about what Buzzards Bay Massachusetts Recreational Boat
Owners Are Doing To Comply with Regulations. Most
boats have compartments inside their hull that serve to capture
rain and seawater entering the hull of the boat. These compartments
also capture fuel and engine oil that may leak within the boat.
Boats with fuel compartments, inboard engines, and drive shafts
are far more likely to leak oil into these compartments. Maintenance
of inboard engines can also result in spills into the bilge. Many
bilges can drain automatically when a boat is in motion, but almost
all boats have pumps to evacuate the bilge compartment to prevent
boats from swamping. These pumps often turn on automatically when
water levels rise too high in the boat. The pumping of bilge water
laden with fuel and oil is an important source of oil to the marine
environment and is often the cause of the oily sheen seen in some
harbors or near some marinas.
In the fall of 1999, the Buzzards Bay Action Committee
(BBAC) received a grant from the Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management
office, through its Coastal Pollution Remediation Program, to provide
bilge oil absorption devices to recreational boaters in Buzzards
Bay. These devices are generally referred to as "bilge socks", "bilge
pads", or "bilge pillows" depending on their shape. The purpose
of this initiative was to raise the awareness of the boating community
as to the significance of oil and fuel inputs from boat bilge compartment
discharges. Additionally, this initiative was meant to encourage
boaters to use oil-absorbing bilge socks to capture this oil and
fuel before it is discharged to the marine environment. The grant
also provided funds for towns to pay for the establishment of collection
sites for the bilge socks, and to pay for their disposal. The Town
of Dartmouth, on behalf of the Buzzards Bay municipalities, administered
the BBAC grant.
Most boats are expected to require one or two
bilge socks during each boating season to capture oil and fuel leaking
into their bilge compartments. While each boater would get their
first bilge sock free through this program, the expectation is that
when boaters see the value of the bilge sock, they will continue
to purchase and use them on their own. Although it is believed that
bilge socks are not widely used by Buzzards Bay boaters, their typical
retail cost of $7 to $12 is not viewed as an impediment if their
utility and value is recognized and understood. Another benefit
of this program is that Buzzards Bay municipalities and private
marinas will continue to provide disposal services for bilge socks.
At the request of the Buzzards Bay Action Committee,
the Buzzards Bay Project provided technical assistance in the development
of the request for proposals and the testing of the bilge socks.
A foremost goal of the BBAC was to implement an easy, clean, and
cost effective process for recovering bilge oil. Because of concerns
about maintaining recycling equipment, OSHA requirements on operating
recycling equipment, and permitting and liability issues that would
be involved with keep used oil drums on docks, the use of reusable
bilge socks was rejected. Instead, single use socks that could be
incinerated at conventional waste disposal facilities was the preferred
type of product. |
|
|
Under the Clean
Water Act, as amended by the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990, EPA has greater authority to pursue administrative,
judicial, and criminal penalties for violations of the regulations and
for discharges of oil and hazardous substances. Under the new penalty
system, three different courses of action are available to EPA in the
event of a spill: (1) EPA may assess an administrative
penalty against the facility; (2) EPA may seek a judicial penalty
against the facility in the federal court system; or (3) EPA may seek
a criminal action
against the facility in the federal court system. Administrative
Penalties EPA may assess administrative penalties
against oil or hazardous substance dischargers as well as facility owners
or operators who fail to comply with the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation.
The administrative penalty amounts that violators must pay have increased
under the OPA, and a new system of administrative penalties was created
based on two classes of violations. Class I violations may be assessed
an administrative penalty up to $10,000 per
violation, but no more than $25,000 total. The more serious
Class II violations may be assessed up to $10,000 per
day, but no more than $125,000 total. However, a facility that
has been assessed a Class II administrative penalty cannot be subject
to a civil judicial action for the same violation. Judicial
Penalties Judicial penalties may be assessed against
facility owners or operators who discharge oil or hazardous substances,
who fail to properly carry out a cleanup ordered by EPA, or who fail to
comply with the oil pollution prevention regulation. Courts may assess
judicial penalties for discharges as high as $25,000 per day or up to
$1,000 per barrel of oil spilled (or $1,000 per reportable quantity of
hazardous substance discharged.) For those discharges that result from
gross negligence or willful misconduct, the penalties increase to no less
than $100,000 and up to $3,000 per barrel of oil spilled (or per unit
of reportable quantity of hazardous substance discharged). Owners and
operators of facilities that fail to comply with an EPA removal order
may be subject to civil judicial penalties up to $25,000 per day, or three
times the cost incurred by the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund,
as a result of their failure to comply. Finally, if the facility fails
to comply with its EPA-approved SPCC plan, the civil judicial penalty
may reach $25,000 per day of violation. |
May we suggest the following items:
|